AI Adoption

See what AI is changing in your engineering

Liz connects to source control and shows where AI is in use, how AI work compares to non-AI work, and what that means for the business. Folks are using it for AI adoption and impact, keeping roadmaps on track, and automating board reports.

AI Adoption Rollup in Liz: a team-level composite score and individual metric scorecards.
AI Adoption Rollup in Liz: a team-level composite score and individual metric scorecards.

Built on experience

Sema has analyzed tech companies for investors for 9 years

2,700

companies analyzed

$2.7T

in enterprise value

19

AI adoption metrics in one model

13

metrics from source control alone

The logic model

From AI spend to business outcomes

19 metrics, read left to right. Resources are what the organization brings. Activities are what AI changes. Outputs are what the work produces. Outcomes are what the organization gets, and they matter most.

Resources · What you bring

3 metrics: the pre-AI baseline, AI tool seat adoption, and seat activity versus observed commits.

Activities · What AI changes

Writing code with AI tools, and setting up the repository for AI. These are the intervention, not metrics.

Outputs · What the work produces

12 metrics. AI in use: share of commits and pull requests, breadth, tooling and readiness. AI versus non-AI: review time, size, reverts and cycle time.

Outcomes · What the organization gets

4 metrics: defect escape rate, features shipped, lead time from ticket to ship, and cost per merged pull request. Each is measured against the pre-AI baseline.

The AI adoption logic model, from resources and activities through outputs to four business outcomes.
The AI adoption logic model, from resources and activities through outputs to four business outcomes.

Example · anonymized

Edtech company: 85% of code AI adjusted

From 30 minutes of setup.

85%

of committed code is AI-assisted.

+36%

pull requests.

~40%

more features shipped, counted in the work tracker.

0

change in the regression rate.

Two depths

Start with 1 connection. Add 3 more when ready.

Depth is about data access, not performance. A Depth 1 organization can score well on every metric it collects.

Depth 1 · AI in use

Source control only. Always on. 13 of the 19 metrics: where AI is used, and how AI work compares to non-AI work.

Depth 2 · Payoff

6 more metrics, including all 4 outcomes. Work tracking adds 3, AI tool telemetry 2, finance 1.

Beyond engineering

AI adoption in go-to-market

See how broadly and frequently go-to-market teams use AI, and the variety of workflows it supports. The report gives sales, marketing and customer-success leaders a shared view of adoption.

Illustrative Sema report · June 2026. Preliminary alignment score and breadth, depth and variety of AI adoption; comparison benchmarks are marked coming soon.
Illustrative Sema report · June 2026. Preliminary alignment score and breadth, depth and variety of AI adoption; comparison benchmarks are marked coming soon.

How it works

Three steps

Step 1 · Connect source control

Liz reads your history to set the pre-AI baseline.

Step 2 · See AI in use

13 metrics fill in: AI in use, and AI versus non-AI.

Step 3 · Add connections

Work tracking, AI tool telemetry and finance unlock the other 6, including all 4 outcomes.

Questions

Frequently asked

Does Liz rate individual engineers?

No. Liz reports at the team level, never the individual.

What do you need to start?

Read access to source control. Everything else is optional.

Can the results go to the board?

Yes. Folks use Liz to automate board reports on AI adoption and impact.

Get started

See your AI adoption, one connection in

Connect source control and we will walk you through the result live.

Sema works with some of the world’s most amazing organizations